SHORT ANSWER
The 10,000x ceiling is the same across all RTP versions. What changes at 92.38% and 88.27% is the payout distribution in the mid-range — reduced payouts throughout normal play — and faster bankroll erosion, which reduces your total bonus exposure. Same ceiling, harder practical path.

How RTP versions change the game math

When an operator selects the 92.38% or 88.27% RTP configuration, the game's mathematical model adjusts. The developer does not cap the max win differently per config — that would violate advertising standards in regulated markets. Instead, the payout distribution changes at every level below the maximum.

In the 96.30% version, the game returns 96.30 per 100 wagered across millions of spins. In the 88.27% version it returns 88.27. The missing 8.03 comes from reduced payouts throughout the normal play range, particularly in the 5x to 500x territory where most actual wins fall.

RTP VERSIONHOUSE EDGEMAX WINMID-RANGE DISTRIBUTION
96.30%3.70%10,000xFull Hacksaw spec
94.30%5.70%10,000xSlightly compressed
92.38%7.62%10,000xMeaningfully reduced
88.27%11.73%10,000xSignificantly suppressed

Why reduced mid-range payouts matter for max win access

Reaching the 10,000x max win in Fist of Destruction requires a specific sequence: accumulating enough Victory Points to reach advanced Epic Spin states, having 4 to 5 Fist Wilds pre-loaded in optimal positions, and those Fists collecting high-value multipliers — 50x to 200x range — through Fighter punches, with multiple Fists covering the same paylines so their multipliers compound.

Steps 3 and 4 involve probability distributions that Hacksaw can tune per RTP version. If the 88.27% version achieves its lower return partly by reducing the frequency of high-value multiplier reveals — making 50x to 200x multipliers less common relative to 2x to 10x ones — then the path to step 3 becomes harder. The cap has not changed; the probability of reaching it has.

The bankroll survival problem

There is a second effect: your bankroll does not last as long at lower RTP versions. With 11.73% of every euro going to the house on the 88.27% version, you burn through a session budget significantly faster than at 3.70% on the 96.30% version.

Reaching the conditions for a 10,000x win requires surviving long enough in the bonus round. If your bankroll is depleted faster by lower mid-range returns, you have fewer total bonus triggers per budget. Each bonus trigger is an opportunity for a large win — fewer triggers means fewer chances at the max, even if the stated maximum remains identical.

One consistent path regardless of RTP version: Buying the Ultimate Throwdown bonus at 250x stake has an explicitly stated RTP of 96.35% regardless of base game configuration. If you are at an 88.27% casino and want the best shot at a large win, buying the bonus directly is more defensible than grinding through a suppressed base game.

BOTTOM LINE
The max win is the same on paper across all four versions. In practice, lower RTP versions make it harder to reach through compressed mid-range payouts and faster bankroll erosion. If chasing 10,000x is your goal, the 96.30% version gives you the fairest mathematical path. At 88.27% you are climbing the same mountain with a smaller pack and more friction along the way.